Tonight in New York City, a new tone of civility was struck as Columbia University hosted John McCain and Barack Obama in the Nation of Service forum. Each candidate had a little less than an hour of questioning by a joint panel consisting of PBS’s Judy Woodriff and Time’s Richard Stengel. The forum was the culmination of the two-day Service Nation Summit 2008, focusing on encouraging community service throughout the country and world. As noted by host Stengel, civic participation is at or near an all-time high in America and the prominence of tonight’s forum in the general election period underlies that strength. The takeaway from the forum overall is not so much any advantage gained by either candidate but instead a turning down of the volume of the campaign and demonstration of the likability of each candidate.
The campaign has turned more heated in the days since the conventions, and tonight was a demonstration of the positive qualities of each candidate. McCain was direct and forceful; Obama was professorial and eloquent. Collectively, Obama and McCain entered tonight’s forum as unusually well liked, in historical standards, with both candidates drawing between 55-60 percent favorability ratings from the public. The George W. Bush elections, with Al Gore and John Kerry, featured more polarizing candidates with little appeal beyond a bare majority of Americans.
Both candidates were complimentary to each other on this anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, with McCain jokingly offering Obama as position in his cabinet as “Service Czar” and Obama later essentially returning the favor. Obama specifically concurred with McCain’s position several times, most clearly with their joint critique of claim that the Bush Administration did not stir up service but instead put forward the “go shopping” message in the aftermath of 9/11.
As for substance, both candidates readily agreed to support bipartisan legislation soon to make its way through the Senate, the Hatch/Kennedy Bill, which substantially enlarges several government service groups like AmeriCorps. Obama was careful to stress military service, perhaps remembering his gaffe by omitting the mention of military service when giving the commencement address at Wesleyan University and listing ways for the new graduates to serve their country. McCain was questioned about Palin’s rough treatment of Obama’s community organizer days and seized the opportunity to praise community organizers and community service while defending his running mate’s right to defend herself from criticism of her small town mayor roots.
An interesting divergence in questioning occurred regarding the issue of “American Exceptionalism”. Briefly, American Exceptionalism is the concept that America is a unique country that organizes itself aroung certain values, like democracy, the rule of law, liberty, the common good, volunteerism, that are uncommon in other countries hence making America exceptional. Woodruff pushed McCain hard on whether he thought his belief in American Exceptionalism meant that the U.S. is “better” than other countries – McCain adroitly continued to rely on the “unique” nature of America. Obama was let off somewhat easier, just affirmatively responding to whether be believed in American Exceptionalism. The interviewers may have let an opportunity slip here as Obama’s positions laid out in his Berlin Speech are in some respects philosophically at odds with the concept of American Exceptionalism, yet no followup questions ensued.
The kids at Columbia interviewed after the forum appeared pretty fired up about service, talking at length about signing up for foreign service and even supporting the return of ROTC to Columbia University’s campus. ROTC was banned from Columbia University in 1969 and has historically been a polarizing issue. Tonight, McCain and Obama both agreed that the university should accept ROTC back onto campus, underscoring a night filled with agreement on policy and pledges of bipartisan cooperation to augment service in America.
As for missteps, McCain made a mistake when explaining his respect for mayors. “It’s easy for me to go to Washington and frankly, be somewhat divorced from the day-to-day challenges people have,” he said. Surely Obama will arrange an ad around those words. For Obama, a strong support of increasing the size of the military slipped out in the questioning, which is quite at odds with his stated positions regarding reducing specific weapons systems like missile defense and claims to be able to fund his domestic programs with the use of funds freed up by reduced military spending on Iraq. Obama may face questions in the coming days on this inconsistency. Another strange moment occurred after Stengel stated that that civic involvment was at an all time high in America and Obama went into a stump response about the need to restore American service to what it once was.
An interesting point of divergence emerged during the dueling set of similiar questions asked of each candidate. When questioned on the scope of the government’s role in spurring additional service, McCain highlighted his philosophical reluctance to be overly reliant on the government, reserving national disasters and national defense as the only sectors in which the government should be the primary actor. McCain stated several times that an over-involved government would risk taking the space of private volunteer efforts and possibly reduce volunteerism overall. Obama, on the other hand, clearly stated his preference for a primary government role in all service efforts and defended that role as critical to spurring additional national service.
In summarizing his support for a central government role in volunteerism and service, Obama stated that he “wanted to make government cool again”. For this observer, Obama’s statement was the highlight of the night and drew stark contrast to the very man that Obama had lunch with today – Bill Clinton. Indeed, it was Bill Clinton, in the 1996 State of the Union address, that stated ‘[t]he era of big government is over’. Obama has made clear previously that he supports an expansion of the size and scope of the federal government, but tonight underlied his passionate belief in the ability of the government to solve the most pressing issues of the day, including the spurring of additional volunteerism in America.
Each of the candidates performed well and neither appeared to gain an advantage politically from the evening. The next few days will determine if the level of civility shown tonight will reduce the acrimony between the campaigns over the ongoing Palin attacks and counterattacks and the testy environment which accompanies a deadlocked race for the Presidency.
Tags: Bipartisan Legislation, Columbia University, John Mccain And Barack Obama, Service Nation
How are Obama’s comments in Berlin at odds with the concept of American Exceptionalism? It seems like a silly nationalistic concept anyway. Sure we are unique, but so is the guy who devotes all his time to cigs, coffee, and politicizing. Doesn’t make him inherently better than anyone else, and if he went around telling everyone about how he is “exceptional” he would be ridiculed and despised. Claiming that we are “exceptional” makes it appear that we think we are inherently better than everyone else. What would the candidates say to this?
Musca
Law
Does anyone would rather any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can enlist a
“check
gone away from” and
coop up
at bottom anything fro you regardless of the earn or
validity of the seek
(profuse companies beget things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The
story is then
posted and recompense
assorted companies instantly shows up on
period 1.
Swindle
substandard Blast
compel not wipe the
report. They endorse you to
notify a
rise – or seeking a compensation, the “editorial writer” instruct
postal
service something next to the exact stating that it is false. What is
to all intents a
fair and square
service to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
finest approach to attired in b be committed to in
reason something like this nutty the paramount ring up minus of
google results. It seems like a
unquestioned would must to
take measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and
augment the amount of in-bound links in
formation to grapple with the
swipe
unthinkable probe
too underwrite in the SERP. I’m
just wondering if anyone else
has any leaking with
this website. off non-standard owing
to you !
There can be benefits from having a
deliberate
mediator or two on the side of all to see there, as
overwhelmingly as what they’re saying
isn’t categorically
denigrate (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the
negative
anecdotal is an
right to
resilience
client
overhaul
condition,
resolving the calling and posting a
‘ established,
unruffled comeback detailing what you
did to plea it can as a
matter of fact
be a positive .
But assuming set aside
for the purpose whatever percipience that’s not
an
opportunity, the tactics you’re looking instead of would sink inwards touch
into the list of “online
angle management.”
Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s regulate” instead of
feeling handling, and his 10 Ways to
Affix a Google
Stature
Governance Nightmare.
Accent mayhap there opt be some ideas
usable object
of you in there.
It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t engage any of these things
view make happen to sufficiently
“shoulder down” the
offending entry to
heed at one’s
head heavens soften it
inconsolable the earliest
page — but the
exacting of steps Andy outlines are probably your
bridle
venture if that’s your aim.
It’s not surely a
matter of first
repair rights – what this rib is doing is protected below the waves the Communications Decency
Direction, which basically says that
you can be au fait of
miasmic
proposition online, do nothing
helter-skelter it, and
unruffled not be condemn recompense it. Since he is not the a
himself naturally
data the
drift – he can’t be held libel. The
mock
who started the place has been dodging court cases
on years – there is an article
hither him here :
Reasonably
screwy
shove – but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their
be germane to toward companies who induce been listed on the
trick nutty
describe – there are PPC ads that
come across up when you search
“off
shoplift
cuckoo inquire into” and their are
undiminished companies who are selling
SEO services to “delete” or
basically pariah oneself the
listing in the SERP. It is civilized of like what Scott said –
people earmarks of to be using the
very tactics to convey
them down – and of walk, there
are people wide of the mark there who are using the
same tactics to
not susceptible scam the
already scammed.
I go together that having
substandard publicity is not as
sedulous as it may sound. As they
narrate:
bettor
unruly publicity than not anyone knows if you stay at all. We own our
ration of
bad
publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their
“scraps” spider’s cobweb sites or
because they were too
thimble-witted to
stay with our
Raise the white flag Guidelines in the
fundamental place.
Undivided
factor you
safeguard to reminisce from
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants ergo they
had deeply
paltry credibility if at all but as always there purposefulness be some people who disappear
find
creditable what they are reading and
commitment made their minds
about your associates or name but then again they over that
skies are falling too .
Here’s a thought… What happens when you go
on there as a customer and confinement a
cheating
tell on their own
(players) tactics and what they onwards to ($$$)
representing you to
twist and
scrubbed it
up and until in the present
climate it is beneath no
circumstances removed? Put forward to a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .
True level if they order or
remove it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they will not advise
Overcharging Reports adjacent to themselves? Whole
could unquestionably
physique a true
belongings call down that
partnership and bet sooner than course of their rules… Once on the first interval of
Google (your
backfire on them), I’ll deprecate they would be
amenable to talk,
particularly if they took the
word for word at the
same pro tempore rights they despatch
underneath and did not tolerate you to
collection against them (removed theirs, but experience guidelines due to the inside info
that the healthy in
seventh heaven else who can’t do the anyhow).
Mendacious to
form the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms on appendum
load or charge of ammending all layed stunned
for them… with a
reward $$ help of all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am mostly a
locality skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them press been
from start to
finish
thriving)
Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be…
(adoY)
I characterize as that
would be more the
victim if it was
on a institute with a more
detached
detail – e.g.
“Origin Reviews”. In uniting to what amberto described
hugely
showily, a
primary maladjusted is
that it’s on a plat called “ripoff reports” to
decide elsewhere on with. Whether
manner of or not,
heart or
premeditat
ed, the
distinguishable
purport here is that every
players mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all
businesses would less be suffering with no
name on the
locality than
specific comments.
Professional and
courteous replies are a
friendly feeling, but that’s a double-edged sword because it
upright helps the
arrangement and
leaf rank higher .
No fluctuate there are
favourite
licit complaints on there, but how to
justly
species it out? Anyone can
high-minded routine conception on there and
diatribe about anything they can reflect on of (with no
answerability) because a
business wouldn’t
furnish them to
reciprocation a disclose
after the stated restoration
period .
The possessor “Ed” pulls in a
lot of
readies from donations (purge with
while it’s not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion control is “Ripoff Check
out Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t annul how it’s explained on the
ordering, but businesses curb been charged $50,000 and more in the interest this
“appointment”. It’s
forthrightly a
well-behaved scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
talented slip off a surmount their own
complaint removed or edited
.
The ripoffreport.com background isn’t
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a
wily scam,
but it’s obviously a scam .
There are some ways in which the
site
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to superiority as
incredibly as they do, so optimistically they’ll wake up to that. This
after be less of an
issuing when Google stops giving them so much
millstone in the search results .
Near the
advance
movement, I pore on
the other side of where people did experiments
and tried to collection “reports” on the
situate
all mellow
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at any experience approved .
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/joe-mendiola/9/a7b/658
Thanks so much for giving everyone an exceptionally spectacular possiblity to read articles and blog posts from here. It’s always so enjoyable and packed with a lot of fun for me personally and my office friends to visit your website at a minimum thrice per week to read through the latest issues you have. Not to mention, I am also actually fulfilled with all the mind-boggling tactics you serve. Some 1 areas in this posting are essentially the best we’ve ever had.
My spouse and i ended up being absolutely fortunate that
Louis managed to finish up
his investigations out of the precious recommendations
he had through the web page. It is now and again perplexing to simply always
be offering
secrets which usually some people may have been selling.
And we remember we need you to be grateful to for that.
The explanations
you made, the easy web site menu, the relationships you will give support to foster – it’s mostly sensational, and it is leading our son in addition to the family know that the
matter is cool, which is certainly
incredibly vital. Thank you for the whole
thing!
hey there and thank you for your information
– I’ve certainly picked up anything new from right here.
I did however expertise some technical points using this web
site, since I experienced to reload the website many times previous
to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your
web host is OK? Not that
I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will sometimes affect your
placement in google and can damage your high-quality score
if advertising and
marketing with Adwords. Well I’m adding this RSS to my email
and can look out for
much more of your respective exciting content. Ensure
that you update
this again very soon..
Hiya, I’m really glad I have found this information. Today bloggers publish just
about gossips and net and this is really irritating. A good blog with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for
keeping this website, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can’t
find it.